GRID K240Q vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GRID K240Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 145 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |