HD Graphics 4400 vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 4400 and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 440% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 400 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 4400 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 20 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |