HD Graphics 5300 vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 5300 and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 500 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 169% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 214% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |