HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics P530 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
HD Graphics P530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics P530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics P530 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics P530 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P530.
- HD Graphics P530 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics P530 has 1739 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- HD Graphics P530 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics P530 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 250 MHz higher, than HD Graphics P530.
- HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Fortnite is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics P530 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |