Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 260% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |