Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 375% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 58% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 108% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |