Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro FX 3800

    When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price
    Quadro FX 3800

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro FX 3800
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 108 Watt
    Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type eDRAM GDDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
      Check Price
    • Quadro FX 3800 has 140% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 9−10 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 21−24 10−11
    medium / 1080p 10−12 1−2
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro FX 3800
    Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Tesla 2.0
    Code name Haswell GT3e GT200B
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 5 June 2013 30 March 2009
    Pipelines 40 192
    Core clock speed 200 MHz 600 MHz
    Boost Clock 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 392 million 1,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 55 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.00 38.40
    Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 462.3 gflops
    Length 198 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 11.1 (10_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 4.0
    OpenGL 4.3 3.3
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.80 N/A
    CUDA 1.3
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares