Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 2666 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | iDG1LPDEV | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 31 October 2020 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |