P106 100 vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between P106 100 and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- P106 100 has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 906 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- P106 100 is 52 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 6408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P106 100 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| P106 100 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 June 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |