Quadro 2000D vs Quadro FX 3800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 2000D and Quadro FX 3800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 2000D stacks up against Quadro FX 3800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 74% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro 2000D and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro FX 3800 is 20 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |