Quadro 4000M vs Quadro FX 3800
When choosing between Quadro 4000M and Quadro FX 3800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 4000M and Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |