Quadro CX vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- Quadro CX has 38% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800 are build with Tesla 2.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 2 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800 is 1600 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Fortnite is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | − |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 1.3 |