Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K4000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14E-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 48.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |