Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 260% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K620M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 429 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |