Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M2000

When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M2000.

Quadro FX 3800

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 3 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 5012 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 466% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	2−3	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	9−10	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−35	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	9−10	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 153% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	7−8	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	4−5	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	1−2	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	2−3	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	75−80
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GT200B	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2009	8 April 2016
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	55.82
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	198 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	1.3	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares