Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 96% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 94 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3908 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 369% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 4600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |