Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M4000

When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro FX 3800

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 173 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 43 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	10−11	60−65
medium / 1080p	1−2	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	2−3	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	9−10	100−110
medium / 1080p	2−3	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	250−260
medium / 768p	75−80	220−230
ultra / 1080p	30−35	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	9−10	70−75
high / 768p	50−55	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	110−120
ultra / 1080p	14−16	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	7−8	80−85
medium / 1080p	2−3	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	40−45	180−190
medium / 1080p	4−5	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	12−14	100−110
medium / 1080p	4−5	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	1−2	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	1−2	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	2−3	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
high / 768p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GT200B	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2009	29 June 2015
Pipelines	192	1664
Core clock speed	600 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	80.39
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	198 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	1.3	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares