Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 260% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M500M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 429 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 2404 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Fortnite is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |