Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro P2000

In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro FX 3800

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 476 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 3 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	10−11	60−65
medium / 1080p	1−2	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 816% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	2−3	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	9−10	100−110
medium / 1080p	2−3	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 1775% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	250−260
medium / 768p	75−80	220−230
ultra / 1080p	30−35	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	9−10	70−75
high / 768p	50−55	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	110−120
ultra / 1080p	14−16	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	7−8	80−85
medium / 1080p	2−3	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 1900% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	40−45	180−190
medium / 1080p	4−5	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	12−14	110−120
medium / 1080p	4−5	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1250% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	140−150
medium / 768p	−	130−140
high / 1080p	1−2	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	1−2	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 7100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	2−3	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3500% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	2−3	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3000% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	55−60
high / 768p	27−30	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Quadro P2000
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Pascal
Code name	GT200B	GP106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2009	6 February 2017
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40	94.72
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length	198 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.3	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares