Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 5970
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 5970, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 5970.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 5970
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 294 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 5970 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 5970 is 107 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Battlefield 5 is 525% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Far Cry 5 is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Fortnite is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GT200B | Hemlock |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 18 November 2009 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 58.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | 305 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |