Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 6950M
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6950M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6950M.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 116% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 6950M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 6950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 58% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 6 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 960 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 580 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 27.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |