Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 466% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 1050% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 153% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Quadro FX 3800 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050