Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 720 / 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 32 / 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 4850
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 A375
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Radeon HD 4850
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R9 A375