Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 450.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 208% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |