Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro 560
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 560, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro 560 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 307 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |