Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro WX 4150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 4150, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 5400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 139% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Metro Exodus is 1800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |