Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 A375

    Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 A375. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 A375. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
    Quadro FX 3800
    Radeon R9 A375

    Main Specs

      Quadro FX 3800 Radeon R9 A375
    Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
     
    • Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
    • Both cards are used in Desktops.
    • Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
    • Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 1596 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 10−11 12−14
    medium / 1080p 1−2 4−5
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

    Full Specs

      Quadro FX 3800 Radeon R9 A375
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN 1.0
    Code name GT200B Venus
    Type Workstation Desktop
    Release date 30 March 2009 no data
    Pipelines 192 640
    Core clock speed 600 MHz 900 MHz
    Boost Clock 925 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 1,500 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.40 37.00
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops
    Length 198 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 4.5 GB/s
    Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s 72 GB/s
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 4.0 5.1
    OpenGL 3.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.2
    CUDA 1.3
     

    Similar compares