Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 M385
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M385. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M385. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Strato |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 56.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |