Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Renoir |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 590