Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 58% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce MX150
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q