Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 153% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M