Quadro FX 3800 vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M60.
Quadro FX 3800
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 177% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 43 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M60 is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 816% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 1850% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1966% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 573% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1283% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 484% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 7100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |