Quadro FX 3800 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro FX 3800

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	30−33
medium / 1080p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	9−10	45−50
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro FX 3800 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	200−210
medium / 768p	75−80	170−180
ultra / 1080p	30−35	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	9−10	24−27
high / 768p	50−55	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	40−45	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 119% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	7−8	35−40
medium / 1080p	2−3	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	4−5	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	35−40	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	1−2	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	4−5	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	30−35
high / 768p	27−30	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 3800	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GT200B	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2009	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	38.40
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops
Length	198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	4.0
OpenGL	3.3
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	1.3
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Quadro FX 3800 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares