Quadro FX 3800 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 300 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 39% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 183% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce GT 440
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640