FirePro M6000 vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M6000 and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M6000 stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 248% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 148 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 2900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M6000 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |