FirePro S7000 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Quadro FX 4800.
FirePro S7000
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro S7000 has 133% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 348 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7000 is 25 mm longer, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |