FirePro W5000 vs Quadro FX 4800

In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W5000 Check Price

Quadro FX 4800

Main Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro FX 4800
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price

Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than FirePro W5000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 223 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
FirePro W5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 4800 is 84 mm longer, than FirePro W5000.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	35−40
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	10−11
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	55−60	9−10
medium / 768p	30−35	8−9
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro FX 4800.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro FX 4800
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Pitcairn	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2012	11 November 2008
Pipelines	768	192
Core clock speed	825 MHz	602 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	38.53
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	183 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	154 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / half length
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro FX 4800

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares