FireStream 9370 vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- FireStream 9370 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 223 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Cypress | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |