GeForce 920MX vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 837% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 363 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce 920MX and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |