GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GT 650M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M SLI.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 790 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 835 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |