GeForce GT 750M vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 750M and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 365 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |