GeForce GT 755M vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 378 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 755M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14P- | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |