GeForce GTX 460M vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800 have maximum RAM of 1536 GB.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 748 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |