GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 670M stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1533 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 4 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |