GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 525% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Fortnite is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GR | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 5080 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |