GRID K160Q vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Quadro FX 4800.
GRID K160Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 182 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |