GRID K260Q vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- GRID K260Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |