GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M10 8Q stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- GRID M10 8Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1528 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 431 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3600 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 1.3 |