GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 50% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1528 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 126% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 1.3 |