Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 64 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 360
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce 830M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760